Copyright © 2012 Nikon Coolpix & Canon Powershot Reviews. All Rights Reserved. Snowblind by Themes by bavotasan.com. Powered by WordPress.
- First PowerShot to feature a 10.0-megapixel Canon CMOS sensor
- Full HD (1920 x 1080 pixels at 30 fps) movie mode plus HDMI output
- 28mm wide-angle 20x optical zoom lens with Optical Image Stabilizer
- 2.8-inch Vari-angle LCD widescreen; DIGIC 4 Image Processor with Face Detection Technology
- Compatible with SD/SDHC, MMC/MMC Plus/HC MMC Plus (not included)
Product DescriptionCMOS image sensor with 10-megapixel effective recording * 20X optical zoom * optical image stabilizer * 4X digital zoom/80X total zoom * 2-13/16″ fold-out swiveling LCD screen * full 1080p movie mode (1920 x 1080 at 30 frames per second) with stereo sound * 16:9 widescreen photo mode (3840 x 2160) * image file formats: JPEG, RAW, RAW+JPEG *
Check Amazon on stock availability : Canon PowerShot SX1IS 10 MP CMOS Digital Camera with 20x Wide Angle Optical Image Stabilized Zoom and 2.8-inch LCD
私は長年にわたって、いくつかのキヤノンのカメラがあります。私は自分の損失をA650として購入することに置き換えられます。一般的に、キヤノンは良いカメラだけでなく、メニューやコントロールを考えています。ないようなパターンです。いくつかの理由については、キヤノンそれらのすべてを取り消すことを決めたがいいカメラなので、それは非常に非常に悪いです：です – メニューを使用して撮影設定を変更すると、迷路のナビゲーションと同様に。場合でも、この1つは他とは違うが、他のキヤノンのモデルを使用します。 。非常に直感的です。 – これは設定とダイヤルアップ接続するためのオプションの選択肢があります。ダイヤル大量の格安され、非常に使用することは困難が応答しなくなります。 – これは、バッテリ駆動の豚です。これは単3電池4、または完全ニッケル充電ニッケル水素電池は、ジュース2600ミリアンペア数日中に必要です。 – レンズ、撤回されていないが、レンズキャップに置き換えられます。あなたの上に配置する必要があります/各時間をオフに挑戦する。場合は、旅行やそれを運ぶ終日 – これは、非常に、非常に大きな欠点は重い、重い。大まかに言えば、このカメラでは、それが何であると推定。することができますはるかに類似したモデル。加えて、少しの場合は、自分のカメラをすることができます。 評価：1 / 5
私もこのカメラで、私はキヤノンを知らないのは、この欠点をリリースする予定に失望した。私は1975年以降、キヤノンユーザーは、現在使用中の時のカメラです。と思うこの高品質の高精細映画ではメインのカメラが、私も、私を使用できるものがほしいのは、もし私を軽く旅行したい。私は、カメラには、このカテゴリーに参照する必要がありますが、このカメラを持つ革新的な昼間のノイズを除き。私のPowerShot A720は、それは私より昨年のように与えている。残念ながら、良い仕事をしていない、キヤノンです – 彼らができます！後ろの。 評価：1 / 5
We use our cameras in our business every day. We have had 3 Nikons in the past. All had outstanding PQ, but all died about every 2-3 years. So we chose this time to look for another camera. We chose on the Canon SX1 IS due to the reviews here. Let me tell you how terrible this camera is;
1. The PQ is horrid. One of our CAMERA PHONES produces nearly identical PQ. Only slightly worse. I called Canon and after discussion to the nice person on the phone, they had no explanation. They suggested I send by e-mail metaphors to one of their higher up techs. Two days shortly, no response.
2. The buttons are in all the incorrect places. You cannot carry or handle this camera w/o hitting buttons unintentionally.
3. This camera weights 1. 5 pounds. That’s about equal to 2 12oz cans of soda. Go pick up two cans of soda and try to carry that around like you would a camera.
4. There is only one way to grip this camera and it requires 2 hands. There is no other way to use it successfully.
5. It only comes with standard rca cables to view the HD video. Which, is just horrible. I don’t know if it’s the cable or the camera, but based on the horrid photos, I’d say it’s the camera. Who in their right mind would place a standard cable with a HD camera? That’s just obtuse.
6. The SD card is very, very hard to get out.
7. The HD movies will not play on my computer. [UPDATE: We had to bring up to date to QT 7 to get them to play. Which does work. But, the video is jerky and jumpy. About every 1 second it seems to skip several frames. It's so terrible it looks like some of those music videos. The PQ just just excellent, on the very low level of HD expected quality. ]
I uploaded a video to youtube so you can see for yourself. Our account on youtube is Flexpvc. Just search for Canon SX1-IS and you should be able to find it. That’s really the video that came out of the camera.
I know I’m being overally dramatic, but it’s hard to keep it cool considering this is a $500+ “HD” camera. I do LOVE the wide field of view, it’s awe-inspiring. The 20x zoom is outstanding. . . in scheme. the problem is, both are worthless if the PQ is not any better than a camera phone. I’ve uploaded my own photos here taken with this camera so you can see for yourself. One shows the dark dot, and the other is the kitchen sink area. You be the judge if I’m being overly critical of this $500 camera.
Bottom line: if you care about the quality of the picture, ease of use, or ergonomics, skip this one.
My experience level: well seasoned amateur.
I question some of the reviews on this site. They sound like they were written by professional copywriters for a PR battle. Trust this one and the other review “Noise and grain. ” This is the truth for this camera.
Rating: 1 / 5
S3からアップグレードする場合、およびS3と推測 – もっと満足のいく結果を提供することです。 SX1はさらに、写真品質のデジタル一眼レフカメラに近いされていないを使用するのCMOS。 SX1はCMOSのではセンサーの大きな失望されます。色とはSX10センサー雑音未満のダイナミックレンジはSX1は私を転送するための安価なカメラから探します。アマゾンのサービスもとても良いです – ので、もしあなたがいい、消費者やプロのカメラを見つけるには、キヤノンSX10を取得する、あるいは、ニコンやソニー。さらに、このCMOS技術は、あまりにも多くの欠点は、SX1は展開を気にしないでください。 評価：2 / 5
Make no mistake, this is not a point and shoot camera. While it comes with fantastic specs, it is a bit harder to use if you’re not used to that level of camera. I had numerous pictures come out blurry. The ISO very nearly has to be redone for each picture (frustrating!). The instruction book must be read, and even then it is hard to remember what all the symbols mean. Some of the pictures appear grainy. The high def video takes up enormous reminiscence. Maybe someone with experience with better cameras would like this and make excellent pictures with it. For me, there was too much dissapointment with it.
Rating: 1 / 5