Subscribe to RSS Feed

Canon PowerShot Pro Series S5 IS 8.0MP Digital Camera with 12x Optical Image Stabilized Zoom

  • 8.0-megapixel CCD captures enough detail for photo-quality 16 x 22-inch prints
  • Ultra-powerful 12x optical zoom; up to ISO 1600 for steady shooting in any lighting conditions
  • High-resolution 2.5-inch vari-angle LCD for simple shooting at any angle
  • DIGIC III Image Processor with improved Face Detection Technology and red-eye correction for sharper metaphors
  • Print/Share Button for simple direct printing and downloading

Product Description
The ultra-powerful 12x optical zoom on the PowerShot S5 IS means you’ll get the shot you want with no compromise, yet that’s only the beginning of what makes this camera so exciting. S5 IS is biased with many of Canon’s latest advanced technologies including the DIGIC III Image Processor, so both still metaphors and movies are rendered with fine detail and luminous clarity. And now ambitious photographers have even greater creative latitude thanks to an included hot shoe adapter that allows you to attach Canon Speedlite EX Series open-air flashes.

Click Link to Check Price/ Order now : Canon PowerShot Pro Series S5 IS 8.0MP Digital Camera with 12x Optical Image Stabilized Zoom

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

5 Responses to Canon PowerShot Pro Series S5 IS 8.0MP Digital Camera with 12x Optical Image Stabilized Zoom

  1. Lord Kill on June 5, 2010 at 4:07 pm

    I had been eyeing this camera since it was first announced. I was looking for a decent camera, a step above the compact point-and-shoots, and a step below the DSLRs. This camera seemed to fit the bill, and it was at my price point also. I bought the camera with the thought that this would be the be-all-end-all of non-DSLR digital cameras for the next couple years, and I bought it before the review sites had their reviews up.

    Anyway, I’ve used the camera for a couple days now and taken about 400 shots with it. It is sweet excellent, even if I want to share my thoughts on a couple things that other reviews have brought up.

    PROS

    Very quick.

    This camera focuses extremely quick (and beeps to let you know it’s in focus), and when it can’t focus it lets you know. I use it in the ‘P’ setting mostly, and if it can’t focus (due to low light or no contrast) it just doesn’t beep. It is very quick to turn on and extend it’s lens.

    Feature-packed.

    The amount of features on this thing are truly spectacular, even the creature comforts are nice (such as the histogram and over-exposure detect). The rotating LCD screen is awe-inspiring. It enables shots that otherwise wouldn’t be possible. You won’t find another ultra-zoom on the market at this price range that offers more in this area.

    Feel

    This camera feels nice. It feels solid (as long as the lens cap is off). The rotating LCD doesn’t feel loose or cheap. The on/off button is nicely located. It makes it fun to use. The zoom is silent too.

    There have been a lot of complaints about the battery door being too flimsy. I reckon this is a small overblown. It’s not as nice as some other cameras, but it’s not that terrible really. As for the batteries being in the same slot as the reminiscence card, I can see why for some people that would be an issue, but for 90% of the users I don’t really see it as that much of a problem. I reckon of it as only having a battery door since I rarely take the reminiscence card out of my cameras anyway ( I just use the supplied cable to transfer the metaphors and a very large reminiscence card).

    CONS

    Noise present.

    There is an unpleasant amount of noise at the 8 MP setting, especially in ISO 200 or above. This seems to be the trend, cram as many pixels as we can into this thing because the market dictates this. Noise is comparable to the FZ8 in my opinion, but, the noise reduction is not so aggressive.

    This being said, I prefer some noise way more than an aggressive noise-reduction logic’s effects. But, if I wanted a camera that delivers the quality of a 5 megapixel camera I would’ve bought one. They are much cheaper.

    Lens cap flimsy.

    The lens cap is somewhat flimsy, falling off easily if you bump it, or even set it on a table too hard. This is obviously so you don’t jam the motor by turning it on without removing the cap (which you’re bound to do eventually). I’m used to the self-contained lens caps which retract automatically, but I know this is tough on a camera with a lens this long. I had a camera once that when powered up would detect that the cap was still on and beep, letting you know to take the cap off. That’s probably too much to question these days.

    Red-Eye.

    The redeye reduction is not fantastic on this camera (it doesn’t pre-fire the sparkle, it just illuminates an LED on the front), so I find for myself using the red-eye removal tool that is in the camera. The results of this were only so-so for me. I’ve had mixed results. Sometimes it works wonders, others it did indeed detect and remove the red-eye, only to replace the red with an unnatural looking black (it’s hard to clarify, but reckon of what the photo touchup machine at Target would do). If you wanna see this, e-mail me. This is OK if you’re just making small prints, even if if you look at it on your computer show at full-res you clearly see this effect. If your subject is looking directly at the camera, the detection can remove the red-eye from both eyes. But, if your subject is not directly at the camera, sometimes the red-eye removal only catches one of the eyes. This is somewhat of a minor issue due to the amount of aftermarket red-eye reduction software available (CS3 anyone?).

    Chromatic Abberation/Blurry Corners

    This seems to be a bit of a problem with this camera. Not more so than some other cameras in this range, but it is annoying. I don’t know what exactly causes it, but I have taken shots in my backyard all through daylight, and whenever light is reflecting off of something with anything dark in the background, I see this red/magenta outlines. Some cameras remove this in processing the JPEG image(e.g. Lumix), which is something that would be nice to have. I’m probably making a larger deal out of it than it really is. I’ve seen much worse in some of the competition. Blurry corners seem to be a problem as well. If you take an open-air scene shot, you’ll notice that the four corners are a small blurry and distorted. Some people wouldn’t see this being that much of a problem, but I like taking open-air scenic shots where details like that are vital.

    Zoom Control.

    This aspect is really annoying. The zoom control is somewhat cheap feeling and over-sensitive. It is one of those that changes zoom speed based on how hard you push the lever. It has a slow speed and a quick speed. But, the slow speed doesn’t have enough hysteresis. It is hard to get the zoom speed just right. I have a feeling the slow speed will wear out and only the quick will remain. I in fact used a S3 with this worn out zoom controller and it was quite annoying, as you could only zoom quick.

    If I weren’t so picky I would LOVE this camera, but the less-than-outstanding image quality make it 4 stars instead of 5. As it is, it’s not perfect for indoor nor open-air shots. If anyone wants to see any examples of stuff I’ve talked about, please e-mail me and i’ll get you some examples.
    Rating: 4 / 5

  2. S. Garfinkle on June 5, 2010 at 5:52 pm

    I’m very pleased with the S5 I bought to replace an S3 — apart from, as prominent elesewhere, I despise that the SD card is now in the battery screened-off area. The hot shoe (open-air sparkle socket) is a HUGE help, since the builtin sparkle on these cameras is sweet wimpy. The camera takes unbelievably excellent pictures and has brilliant first shot and shot-to-shot times (it helps if you use the Energizer e2 Lithium Batteries). Even if the S5 weighs about 4 oz more than the S3 (About 20 oz vs 16 oz inclding batteries), its construction “feels more rugged.”

    BTW, I don’t know that you need to wait for larger cards for larger movies, etc. I use an 8gb SDHC card now. Be careful, though, which SDHC cards you get. Even with Sandisk’s attempt to homogenize the speeds, I found that an A-Data “class 6″ SDHC card was about 25-35% of the speed of my Transcend class 6 card. Also, remember that you need an SDHC card reader (I got mine from meritline for $5).
    Rating: 5 / 5

  3. Rachel Barr on June 5, 2010 at 7:31 pm

    Is anyone else as flummoxed by the negative consumer and expert reviews of this camera as I am? If I were paranoid, I’d reckon a conspiracy existed to drive down the cost of this remarkable camera.

    The range of controls is very broad, their setup is intuitive, and the camera’s performance is exemplary. Not only am I pleased with how the camera handles and what it will do, but I’m WAY pleased with the metaphors it produces. I’ve had my camera for a week now; I’ve played with all the shooting modes and have taken pictures in all sorts of lighting. As long as the camera is set accurately for the shot, metaphors are consistently superb. The ones that have been anything less than stellar were caused by my own hastiness or error.

    Movies also are awe-inspiring, and stereo sound is a huge plus.

    Maybe I just lucked out and got a excellent copy. Maybe it isn’t really the fantastic piece of photographic wizardry I believe it is. But I am a long-in-the-tooth advanced amateur with perfectionistic tendencies. And in my estimation the S5 IS is an incredible tool.

    Minor issues inherent in a camera of this sensor size and lens zoom range do exist. According to the many expert camera reviews, there presently is not a mega-zoom on the market that is completely free of chromatic aberration and some noise at higher ISOs. If you’re plotting to print poster-sized metaphors, get a 35mm digital SLR and some very expensive lenses–you’ll be pleased with nothing less. But if you’re looking for a go-anywhere camera that bridges the gap between that huge D-SLR and the teensy small super-compact in your photo bag, if most of your prints are average size, and you do the majority of your viewing on a computer, look no further. You can’t go incorrect with the S5 IS.

    PS. Oh, yeah, one more thing. It’s just plain FUN!
    Rating: 5 / 5

  4. oddlycalm on June 5, 2010 at 9:34 pm

    After buying the S5 to replace my S3 I was very disappointed with the image noise as prominent on another review here. This is not a Canon only problem and it’s becoming a troubling trend as megapixels are added at the expense of image quality.

    It’s not a matter of the S5 being better than the Sony H7 or H9, it’s a matter of any of these cameras being able to equal their own previous generation model with regard to noise. The megapixel war is simply marketing nonsense unless you plot on printing wall posters or drastically cropping metaphors. The fact is that only so many pixels can be place on the same size image sensor before the noise level becomes a problem and anti-noise electronic counter events simply trade one problem for another.

    My S5 went back to the store and I’ll continue to use my S3. I’ll miss the hot shoe and the new LCD viewing screen, but for me photography is more about metaphors that camera features. Eventually the companies will probably come around, but until then you may want to regard ever higher megapixal ratings with suspicion.
    Rating: 3 / 5

  5. Michael Janocik on June 6, 2010 at 12:21 am

    I owned the S3 for three months – I bought it at a very reputable national seller that had a very generous return policy. THe S3 is a fantastic camera and if you are cash strapped, you’ll be hard pressed to find a better camera under $300 than the S3. But, I did look at the Canon S5 and found it worth the $200 upgrade for me. I buy cameras about every 4-5 years and I reckon the larger and higher resolution LCD makes the S5 a superior camera to the S3. They both take fantastic pics and I don’t particularly care that the S5 has 8 Megapixels. The best camera I ever owned was a Nikon Coolpix 950 – I’d place it’s pics up against any and it was only 2.1 Megapixels. Megapixels is for marketing purposes, but after you acheive a certain level of resolution, it’s pointless beyond that. Anyway, the S5 has some nice upgrades including, I reckon, a better battery door, better buttons – they’re recessed and softer and have a better feel. Also is a metal tripod mount, hot shoe, Digic III image processing, and a larger, higher resolution LCD. The video mode allows for larger file sizes as well, which means you can record for more than 1 GB before having to start a new file. The S3 is a fantastic camera and the S5 is the S3 with a few nice refinements. If you are one to upgrade every year or two, get the S3 – it’s a fantastic camera. If, on the other hand, you upgrade every 3-5 yearas and you want the best you can get for your money right now and you can afford another $150-$200, get the S5.
    Rating: 5 / 5

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*


Security Code:

Our Recommendation

Stock Photos, Royalty Free Stock Photography, Photo Search

Powered by Yahoo! Answers