Copyright © 2012 Nikon Coolpix & Canon Powershot Reviews. All Rights Reserved. Snowblind by Themes by bavotasan.com. Powered by WordPress.
- New 10-megapixel High Sensitivity Logic; DIGIC 4 Image Processor
- Improved low-light image performance, plus a Low Light scene mode for ISO settings up to 12,800
- Customizable control ring for simple access and operation of manual or other creative shooting settings
- Wide-angle 3.8x optical zoom with Canon’s Optical Image Stabilizer; bright f/2.0 lens
- RAW + JPEG shooting and recording modes; capture metaphors to SD/SDHC reminiscence cards (not included)
製品DescriptionTheキヤノンS90ポータブル強烈なシュートを提供するために、毎日。迅速で、10優れた低光性能の高感度を得るのレンズ制御リングを撮影する。 0モバイル砂漠化対処条約とは、f / 2。 0レンズ。高感度CCDセンサー、優れた画像品質を条件に様々な照明を提供します。高では、イメージを示しても、非常に低いノイズレベルと広いダイナミックレンジを撮影ファイルのISO。 F鮮やか/ 2レンズです。 0 Gapは、特別な汎用性の低光の画像をキャプチャできるようにする。 。 。詳細”"




キヤノンは、最新のカメラの写真S90としてもてはやさ、私は全体の夏に向けて待機しているカメラ。私は1を購入して、ローカルの1週間後にも、画像の何百もの撮影よりも、私を格納するために戻すことで入手することができますします。私は、カメラに、私はSD780ISまたはSD950ISよりも悪く、一部の古いS90の詳細午前見た最悪のバレル歪み性能。 、ほとんどのものじゃないけどさ、卓越して良い私にとっては、S90のデジタルカメラです。無限のシーンモードとビデオI必要を感じるものではありませんが、ほとんどすべてのカメラのエンドポイント上での撮影”とさらなるサービスのようにS90の何も特別な、これらの”機能を提供する。私は今ライカにはX1と、それはまた、カメラの広告写真家として使用されることが待っています。 。我々が表示されます。 評価:1 / 5
I was very excited when I received this camera. . . well my excitement was small lived. I may have gotten a lemon because the pictures taken with my canon sd990 was a lot clearer, sharper and cleaner. My sd990 would take low light picture at iso 400 and s90 would take it at iso 800. Both were set on Auto. I compared those pictures that were taken at the same iso 800 and the pictures of s90 was blurred and noiser. Some has white patches on it. I have no choice but to return it back.
Rating: 1 / 5
For those contemplating between these 2 cameras, as I did: for what it’s worth, I chose to go with the Lumix DMC-LX3. I really was about to take the Canon. But I went to a store and compared the two in hand. Without a doubt, the LX3 won me over. The S90 felt cheap, overly too-simplified, and looked cheap. I am not commenting on use nor quality of photos. I know LX3 already has a fantastic reputation, felt solid in my hand, and looked like a more serious camera. I really didn’t reckon I’d be influenced by the superficial looks, but as the S90 was sweet unknown and I had a terrible experiences with recent Canons, I chose the LX3 was for me. Don’t get me incorrect: I like Canons, and I had a fantastic one (S30). But for some reason, Canon’s point and shoots started to go downhill for me. The quality wasn’t as sharp, and they seemed to just die on me suddenly (I also owned the Canon A95).
After feeling the LX3 in hand, and then the S90, I knew I had to take the LX3. Sure, there are some inconveniences of the LX3 (lens cap, protruding lens, having to go through a menu of items), but I know I will have a tried and right camera (with a Leica lens, nonetheless!), and a resellable camera if needed (which I don’t ever plot to sell!).
I highly recommend that those undecided between these cameras go and see them in a store. I went to J+R.
PS: I’m not a professional photographer, but I like a camera I can grow into, with custom settings, and can take everywhere with me. Considering these cameras cost about the same, I am glad I took the LX3. Colors are not as “saturated” as the Canon, but the quality, in my opinion, is far better.
Rating: 2 / 5