Canon S95 Review

10 Responses to Canon S95 Review

1. 

   nikespex on February 2, 2011 at 4:20 pm

   At 0:13 you say it has a CMOS sensor. That is incorrect. This camera has a CCD sensor.
2. 

   carperpaul on February 2, 2011 at 5:06 pm

   If you can only give a 73sec review then why bother ?
3. 

   andysnap on February 2, 2011 at 5:08 pm

   I paid £290 for my S95, which I reckon is the right price for a quality compact. The camera is very nearly too small, and really needs the Richard Franiec grip, which I’ve added to mine, to aid the handling. Compared to my Ricoh CX1, the S95 is a slow camera to use, but quick enough by any other comparison. Image quality is very excellent, though slightly soft out of the camera. A small post-sharpening helps. An enjoyable camera, but ‘not quite there’, I reckon.
4. 

   chloegoesboom13 on February 2, 2011 at 5:22 pm

   @danthecat21 s95 is smaller, and maybe whoever is getting it, is just looking for something smaller to carry around simpler, that’s similar to their dslr or something. I don’t know, don’t kill me if you reckon I’m incorrect and obtuse.
5. 

   danthecat21 on February 2, 2011 at 5:47 pm

   £400?! I Got a canon EOS 500D for about £550, which ok is quite a lot but it’s got 100X more features than this camera, it has 1080p video mode, and up to 12000 ISO. :3
6. 

   johanneswingerlang on February 2, 2011 at 6:18 pm

   @catalystman commercials? It’s their own logo… sounds like digiralREV though.
7. 

   nate42nd on February 2, 2011 at 7:17 pm

   I have some real looks (not the best but……) under my user name. I have 2 or 3 after just getting it, menus, and after using it for a while.
8. 

   catalystman on February 2, 2011 at 8:05 pm

   when did the whatdigitalcamera videos start having commercials at the beginning? is this new for the year?
9. 

   Scrubs2U on February 2, 2011 at 8:25 pm

   Excellent review got the info in the time slot and fascinating Thank you, this is the kind of stuff that makes one want to further research a desired product
10. 

    sirNemanjapro on February 2, 2011 at 9:11 pm

    Remove .mov in title.

    This is 91%? WTF!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Name *

Email *

Website

Comment *

Security Code: